Aren't there laws that a house must have running water, proper sewer or septic system ect or it is considered able to be condemned?
I'd like anyone in IL to make a deal that gets me full medical and dental for $275 a month :lol: Hell I'd move Walker into my house if he could do that here :giggles:
Just ask your boss. Cause he'd be footing the bill for the rest of it. :9:
Here is an interesting article on an Appalachian community.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ky-people-live-running-water-electricity.html
The man that is in the article with no electricity also said he got govt assistance (to my knowledge you don't get gov't assit. in third world countries). I also noticed a couple of tvs in the background, kids going to prom, ect. I am not saying these people are not poor I'm just saying you can't compare them to say Haiti.
This:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/2290251.../t/haitis-poor-resort-eating-mud-prices-rise/
is poor.
the pictures of the kitchens in utter shambles that is how my BIL family was in the mid 70's not because they coud not afford better they did not want what most would think was better. So this is why I question by whose standards are they poor? A government that lumps everybody into catagories of wealth or individuals that like it that way want it that way?If they want better then by all means yes we need to get them water sewer ect. If they don't leave them be. That is what they were used to and that was the way it was. Hell but you would see Francis (BIL) mother also sitting on the front porch with a big old wad of chew, no ****, shot gun by her side the whole nine yards of what was precieved of mountain people they were. I spent a summer there in 1979 to help my sister and BIL with the new baby.
I have seen that same pic but the wording is "So you're telling me you have so much clean water, that you **** in it?"
I've never once said that everyone who gets assistance needs it. And I don't believe that.
But I also don't believe that everyone who gets it is abusing it. That' been my point. I think there are a lot of people on both sides of that. But I also think that not enough heat gets put on the system that allows abuse, and yet denies those most in need for one ridiculous reason or another.
And it's getting worse. The system gets more and more broken, and yet more and more funds get cut from places that can't afford it and for which the most vulnerable will suffer (like DCFS).
The waste that goes on unchecked is unbelievable and yet they claim there's no money so they have to keep cutting. It's astounding really.
This may not be the popular opinion, but I think that many problems would be solved if only whole foods were given out for government assistance... vegetables, fruits, meat, beans, grains, milk, herbs, spices. Period. If I were on assistance, which I would have qualified for good chunks of my life, I would be grateful just to have food given to me. I don't see why anyone would feel entitled to more, when they are being handed free food when they need it. When I was very poor, I worked 2 jobs, and ate whole foods, because it was cheaper. Also by eliminating the ability to buy junk food, people would be healthier, and that would eliminate a lot of the health care costs as well. 1 in 3 American adults is diabetic or pre-diabetic, and that is a direct result of eating processed food.
Lack of potable water is not really all that uncommon. There is an entire river plain in GA, thousands of homes, that has been fouled by nearby industry and those people/families who have lived there for generations now have no potable water available to them.
A place to debate everything and anything!